Effect of Longitudinal Spacing on The Flow and Heat Transfer for Staggered Drop-shaped Tubes Bundle in Cross-flow




A numerical study has been conducted to investigate the effect of the longitudinal spacing on the flow and heat transfer characteristics for a staggered drop-shaped tubes bundle at zero angle of attack in crossflow. The study is performed for the Reynolds number Re= 3.18x103 ~ 3.25x104, while the longitudinal spacing SL is 37 and 46.25 mm. A mathematical and numerical model in software package ANSYS FLUENT has been developed for numerical evaluation of heat transfer and flow field of a bundle of drop-shaped tubes, taking into account the strain caused by different pressures inside and outside the tubes. Correlations of the average Nusselt number Nu and a friction factor f in terms of Re and SL for the studied bundle was presented. The result of the present study indicates the superior thermal-hydraulic performance of the drop-shaped tube bundles with a longitudinal spacing of 37 mm over that with a longitudinal spacing of 46.25mm.

Drop-shaped tube, heat transfer, friction factor, Organic Rankine Cycle, longitudinal Spacing, numerical investigation


Volume 21, issue 1, 2020 year


Влияние продольного расстояния на поток и теплообмену шахматного пучка труб каплевидной формы в поперечном обтекании

Проведено численное исследование для исследования влияния продольного расстояния на характеристики потока и теплообмена шахматного пучка каплевидной формы при нулевом угле атаки в поперечном потоке. Исследование выполнено для числа Рейнольдса
Re= 3,18х103 ~ 3,25х104 и для продольного расстояния SL составляет 37 и 46,25 мм. Представлен анализ литературы. Разработана математическая и численная модель для расчета теплообмена и поля потока пучка каплевидных труб с помощью пакета ANSYS FLUENT с учетом напряженно-деформированного состояния труб. Представлены корреляции, позволяющие определить средние по рассмотренному пучку каплевидных труб числа Нуссельта Nu и коэффициента трения f в зависимости от Re и SL. Результаты настоящего исследования показывают, что тепло-гидравлические характеристики пучка труб с продольным шагами 37 мм лучше, чем у продольного шага 46,25 мм. Полученные данные свидетельствуют о существенно более высоких тепло-гидравлических характеристиках каплевидных труб по сравнению с трубами круглого поперечного сечения.

Каплевидные трубы, теплообмен, коэффициент трения, Органический цикл Ренкина, продольное расстояние, численное исследование


Volume 21, issue 1, 2020 year



1. Zhang L.W., Balachandar S., Tafti D.K. and Najjar F.M. Heat transfer enhancement mechanisms in inline and staggered parallel-plate fin heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Trans 1997, vol. 40, p. 2307–25.
2. Ch en Y., Fiebig M. and Mitra N.K. Heat transfer enhancement of finned oval tubes with staggered punched longitudinal vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf . 2000, vol. 43. p.417–35.
3. Nishimura T., Hisayoshi I. and Hisashi M. The influence of tube layout on flow and mass transfer characteristics in tube banks in the transitional flow regime. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1993, 36(3): p. 553-563.
4. Lavasani A. M., Bayat H. and Maarefdoost T. Experimental study of convective heat transfer from in-line cam shaped tube bank in crossflow. Applied thermal engineering. 2016, vol. 65(1-2), 85-93.
5. Toolthaisong S. and Kasayapanand N. Effect of attack angles on air side thermal and pressure drop of the cross-flow heat exchangers with staggered tube arrangement. Energy Procedia. 2013, vol. 34, 417 – 429.
6. Merker G. P. and Hanke H. Heat transfer and pressure drop on the shell-side of tube-banks having oval-shaped tubes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 1986, vol. 1299 (12), Pp. 1903-1909.
7. Horvat A., Leskovar M. and Mavko B. Comparison of heat transfer conditions in tube bundle cross-flow for different tube shapes. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2006. vol. 49, 1027–1038.
8. Sayed A. et al. Heat transfer characteristics of staggered wing-shaped tubes bundle at different angles of attack. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014, vol. 8(50), pp. 1091–1102.
9. A. Sayed et al.Effect of attack and cone angels on air flow characteristics for staggered wing shaped tubes bundle. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014, vol.7(51), pp. 1001–1016.
10. Zhukauskas A. and Ulinskas R.V. Efficiency parameters of heat transfer in tube banks. Heat Transf Eng. 1985, vol. 6 (1), 19–25.
11. Zhukauskas A. Heat transfer from tubes in cross-flow. Adv. Heat Transf. 1972, vol. 8, 93-160.
12. Chilton T. H. and Generaux, R. P. Pressure Drops Across Banks of Tubes. AIChE Transactions. 1933, vol. 29, pp. 161-173.
13. Grimison E. D. Correlation and utilization of new data on flow resistance and heat transfer for cross flow of gases over tube banks. Transactions ASME. 1937, vol. 59, 583–594.
14. Huge E. C. Experimental investigation of effects of equipment size on convection heat transfer and flow resistance in cross flow of gases over tube banks. Transactions ASME. 1937, vol. 59, 573–581.
15. Pierson O. L. Experimental investigation of the influence of tube arrangement on convection heat transfer and flow resistance in cross flow of gases over tube banks. Transactions ASME. 1937, 59, 563–572.
16. Gunter A. Y. and Shaw W. A. A General Correlation of Friction Factors of Various Types of Surfaces in Cross Flow. Transactions ASME. 1945, vol. 67, pp. 643- 660.
17. Kim T. Effect of longitudinal spacing on convective heat transfer in crossflow over in-line tube banks. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2013, vol. 57, pp. 209–215.
18. Mittal S. and Kumar V. and A. Raghuvanshi. Unsteady incompressible flows past two cylinders in tandem and staggered arrangements. Int Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1997, vol. 25(11), 1315-1344.
19. Roychowdhury G. D. and Sarit K. D. Sundararajan T. Numerical simulation of laminar flow and heat transfer over banks of staggered cylinders. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids. 2002, vol. 39, p. 23-40.
20. Nishiyama H., Ota T. and Matsuno T. Heat transfer and flow around elliptic cylinders in tandem arrangement. JASME Int J Ser II. 1988, vol.31(3), 410–419.
21. Mahir N. and Altac Z. Numerical investigation of convective heat transfer in unsteady flow past two cylinders in tandem arrangements. Int Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2008, vol. 29(5), 1309-1318.
22. Deng J., Ren A., FengZou J. and Shao X. Three-dimensional flow around two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement. Fluid Dyn. Res. 2006. vol. 38, p. 386-404.
23. Zdravistch F., Fletcher C. and Behnia M. Numerical laminar and turbulent fluid flow and heat transfer predictions in tube banks. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 1995, vol. 5(8), p. 717-733.
24. Baxevanou C. A. and Fidaros, D. K. Validation of numerical schemes and turbulence models combinations for transient flow around airfoil. Engineering Application of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 2008, vol. 2, p. 208–221.
25. Robertson E., Chitta V., Walters D.K. and Bhushan, S. On the vortex breakdown phenomenon in high angle of attack flows over delta wing geometries. International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, IMECE2014. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November 14–20, 2014.
26. Jafari H. H. and Dehkordi B. G. Numerical prediction of fluid-elastic instability in normal triangular tube bundles with multiple flexible circular cylinders. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2011, vol. 23(1),114-126.
27. Priyank D. P., Karnav N S., Kush V. M. and Chetan O. Y. CFD Analysis Of Heat Exchanger Over A Staggered Tube Bank For Different Angle Arrangement Of Tube Bundles. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 2013, vol. 2(1), 2278-0181.
28. Yakhot V. et al. Renormalization Group Modeling and Turbulence Simulations. International Conference on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows. Arizona, Tempe, 1993.
29. Frank K. Principles of heat transfer. Stamford, CT Singapore: Cengage Learning, 2011.
30. Soe T. M. and Khaing S. Y. Comparison of turbulence models for computational fluid dynamics simulation of wind flow on cluster of buildings in mandalay. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2017, vol. 7(8), 2250-3153.
31. ANSYS Fluent Reference Guide. ANSYS, Inc. Release 16.0, 2015.
32. Yakhot V. et al. Renormalization Group Modeling and Turbulence Simulations. International Conference on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows. Arizona, Tempe, 1993.
33. Tsvetkov F.F. Zadachnik po teplomassoobmenu (Problem book in heat and mass transfer) / F.F. Tsvetkov, R.V. Kerimov, V.I. Velichko. Moscow, MEI Publ, 2008, 196 p., ill. (in Russian).